& dog daycares throughout the USA."> Locate pet sitters, dog walkers, dog runners, & dog daycares throughout the USA.

FDA: Peanut butter plant knew of salmonella

by Therese on January 28, 2009

in Dogs,Pet Food Recall

Elizabeth Weise, who reported extensively on the pet food recall in 2007, and Julie Schmit are on the peanut butter trail. Today they write that the factory pumping out salmonella-contaminated peanut butter knew it was contaminated but shipped it anyway.

The government Tuesday accused the peanut butter manufacturer tied to a nationwide salmonella outbreak of shipping products in 2007 and 2008 after internal tests found bacterial contamination, violating food safety regulations.

Peanut butter and peanut paste manufactured by the Peanut Corp. of America (PCA) has been tied to the salmonella outbreak that has sickened 501 people in 43 states and is believed to have contributed to eight deaths

[...]

The Food and Drug Administration said that its inspection of the PCA plant in Blakely, Ga., found records of 12 instances in which plant officials identified salmonella in ingredients or finished products. The products should not have been shipped, the FDA says. PCA took no steps to address cleaning after finding the salmonella, says Michael Rogers, director of the FDA’s division of field investigations.

In some instances, the company had the product tested again by a different laboratory and got a clean test result, FDA officials said in a telephone conference with reporters.

[...]

“It’s incredibly negligent,” says William Hubbard, a former FDA associate commissioner. Hubbard questions why the FDA didn’t act sooner, given the sanitation violations found by state inspectors.

Previous inspection reports by the Georgia Department of Agriculture found deficiencies in how well the plant was cleaned.

In a statement issued Tuesday, PCA said it “has cooperated fully with FDA from day one during the course of this investigation. We have shared with them every record that they have asked for that is in our possession, and we will continue to do so.”

Shipping products known to be contaminated is “a violation of the law,” says the FDA’s Stephen Sundlof. “Whether or not there was any criminal activity involved is a different issue.”

Sounds familiar, doesn’t it?

Like I said in my last post…it might be best to avoid foods containing peanut butter for a while. I know I am!

Technorati Tags: , ,

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

YesBiscuit! January 28, 2009 at 2:29 pm

I just love this totally legal “lab shopping” and test results being kept secret while the FDA snoozes. Yeah the Salmonella PB shouldn’t have been shipped FDA – good to say that NOW. When I gaze into my crystal-ball-of-corruption, it looks like nobody will be in trouble over this and no changes will be made to protect us from the next round of deadly food. As usual.

Reply

Therese January 28, 2009 at 2:48 pm

Yup! And ya know, it makes me wonder how often suspect food gets shipped out knowingly. I mean if they *know* they’ll only get a slap on the wrist *IF* they get caught, why not? It sure is better for the bottom line, ya know?

Reply

jan January 28, 2009 at 7:02 pm

How could there NOT be criminal activity when they ship out something they know could cause problems? i will really miss peanut butter,

Reply

Leave a Comment